Can We Make Sense of 'Neutrality' in the Religion Clause Cases?: Seven Rescue Attempts, and a Viable Alternative
R. George Wright
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
May 18, 2012
This Article addresses the controversial question of 'neutrality' as a crucial test in a number of important Religion Clause cases. The idea of 'neutrality' in the Religion Clause context turns out to be popular, but unavoidably incoherent.
The Article then explores seven alternative approaches to explaining why Religion Clause neutrality tests persist, despite the evident incoherence of the concept of neutrality. None of these seven alternatives, however, holds much promise for a valuable re-interpretation or rescue of the idea of neutrality.
What is needed is not a re-interpretation of Religion Clause neutrality tests, but a replacement for such tests. The Conclusion offers coherent and useful guidance in addressing many Religion Clause cases, based on a surprising adaptation of elements from the apparently remote area of Takings Clause and police power regulation jurisprudence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61working papers series
Date posted: May 18, 2012 ; Last revised: May 23, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds