The Democratizing Effects of Transjudicial Coordination
Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Law
George W. Downs
New York University (NYU)
May 10, 2012
Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 158-171, May 2012
There are growing indications that transjudicial dialogue among national courts has increased in recent years and that it has become more routinized. We argue below that this trend is at least partially motivated by the efforts of these courts to: address a 'judicial deficit' that has resulted from the broad transfer of regulatory policy-making authority from the domestic to the international sphere; and curb pro-executive interpretations of regulatory rules on the part of less politically insulated international tribunals. While recognizing the dangers of 'le gouvernement des juges', we suggest that, at least in the short term, the expanded role of national courts can operate to enhance rather than pre-empt domestic political processes and promote accountability to diverse democratic concerns by providing opportunities for national legislatures and civil society to weigh in on matters subject to executive discretion or international regulation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: international law, judicial review, democracy, global governance, transjudicial coordinationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 21, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds