|
||||
|
||||
Recursive Ambiguity and Machina’s ExamplesDavid DillenbergerUniversity of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics Uzi SegalBoston College - Department of Economics May 20, 2012 PIER Working Paper No. 12-021 Abstract: Machina (2009, 2012) lists a number of situations where standard models of ambiguity aversion are unable to capture plausible features of ambiguity attitudes. Most of these problems arise in choice over prospects involving three or more outcomes. We show that the recursive non-expected utility model of Segal (1987) is rich enough to accommodate all these situations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13 Keywords: Ambiguity, Ellsberg paradox, Choquet expected utility, recursive non-expected utility JEL Classification: D81 working papers seriesDate posted: May 21, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds