Abstract

 


 



Recursive Ambiguity and Machina’s Examples


David Dillenberger


University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics

Uzi Segal


Boston College - Department of Economics

May 20, 2012

PIER Working Paper No. 12-021

Abstract:     
Machina (2009, 2012) lists a number of situations where standard models of ambiguity aversion are unable to capture plausible features of ambiguity attitudes. Most of these problems arise in choice over prospects involving three or more outcomes. We show that the recursive non-expected utility model of Segal (1987) is rich enough to accommodate all these situations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: Ambiguity, Ellsberg paradox, Choquet expected utility, recursive non-expected utility

JEL Classification: D81

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 21, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dillenberger, David and Segal, Uzi, Recursive Ambiguity and Machina’s Examples (May 20, 2012). PIER Working Paper No. 12-021. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2063939 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2063939

Contact Information

David Dillenberger (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics ( email )
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-1503 (Phone)
Uzi Segal
Boston College - Department of Economics ( email )
140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 188
Downloads: 29

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds