Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2064419
 
 

References (30)



 
 

Footnotes (39)



 


 



The Mutability of Public Reason


Chad Flanders


Saint Louis University - School of Law

June 2012

Ratio Juris, Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 180-205, 2012

Abstract:     
Rawls's “public reason” has not been without its critics. One criticism is that public reason is “conservative.” Public reason must rely on those beliefs that are “widely shared” among citizens. But if public reason relies on widely shared beliefs, how can it change without departing from those beliefs, thus violating public reason? In part one of my essay, I introduce the conservatism objection and describe two unsatisfactory responses to it. Part two argues that there are aspects of public reason which diminish the force of the conservatism objection: first, that public reason is historical, and second, that it is mutable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: May 22, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Flanders, Chad, The Mutability of Public Reason (June 2012). Ratio Juris, Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 180-205, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2064419 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00509.x

Contact Information

Chad Flanders (Contact Author)
Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )
100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63108
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 145
Downloads: 1
References:  30
Footnotes:  39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds