Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2064980
 


 



Justice for Profit: A Comparative Analysis of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Third Party Litigation Funding


Jasminka Kalajdzic


University of Windsor - Faculty of Law

Peter Kenneth Cashman


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

Alana M. Longmoore


Windsor; University of Detroit Mercy

May 23, 2012

American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2013
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/59

Abstract:     
Third party litigation funding (TPLF) has emerged as one of the most important developments in civil litigation. Courts and policymakers in several countries are looking to each other as they debate the costs and benefits of this growing industry, and the need for regulatory oversight. Such cross-pollination in the public and jurisprudential debates on TPLF can be enormously helpful, but must be approached with caution. The TPLF industry operates in very different procedural environments, and any comparative analysis must take into account the various jurisdictions’ unique litigation culture and architecture. In this paper, the authors explore TPLF in the U.S., Australia and Canada, with a focus on class action litigation in the latter two jurisdictions. They examine the historical development of TPLF, current practices, the legal and procedural context within which such funding takes place, and how each jurisdiction is addressing regulation of this form of finance. In the final part of the paper, they engage in a comparative analysis of TPLF in the three countries, and highlight important differences that may ultimately result in unique approaches to regulatory oversight of the industry.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: litigation, finance, costs, class actions

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 26, 2012 ; Last revised: February 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Kalajdzic, Jasminka and Cashman, Peter Kenneth and Longmoore, Alana M., Justice for Profit: A Comparative Analysis of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Third Party Litigation Funding (May 23, 2012). American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2013; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/59. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2064980 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2064980

Contact Information

Jasminka Kalajdzic (Contact Author)
University of Windsor - Faculty of Law ( email )
401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 N9B 3P4
Canada
Peter Kenneth Cashman
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Alana M. Longmoore
Windsor; University of Detroit Mercy ( email )
4001 McNichols Rd
Detroit, MI 48221
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,651
Downloads: 424
Download Rank: 37,434
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Litigation Finance Contract
By Maya Steinitz

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds