Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066166
 
 

Footnotes (108)



 


 



Productive Use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory


Eric R. Claeys


George Mason University

January 8, 2013

Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, eds. James E. Penner & Henry E. Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming)
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-02

Abstract:     
Contemporary American property scholarship is sceptical of Locke’s theory of labour. Robert Nozick (in Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974)) and Jeremy Waldron (in The Right to Private Property (1986)) are both assumed to have discredited Locke’s conception of labour. Locke’s theory seems incoherent because it seems to trade inconsistently on both rights-based and utilitarian components. And contemporary legal scholars are generally uninterested in how law implements moral theories of rights. In political-philosophy scholarship over the last generation, however, Locke’s theory of labour has been substantially rehabilitated. A more charitable line of scholarship construes Locke – like many natural-law or – rights thinkers before him – as propounding a rights-based theory justifying consequentialist reasoning to secure rights. In this scholarship, the moral right to labour seems more sensible because ‘labour’ is justified in relation to the responsibility to produce goods contributing to human self-preservation or – improvement.

This book chapter restates productive labour theory for contemporary legal scholars. The chapter shows how productive labour theory anticipates and avoids the most common sources of scepticism toward labour theory among contemporary legal scholars. The chapter also illustrates how productive labour supplies a moral foundation for legal property rights, some focus to those rights, and a substantial amount of flexibility how to qualify such rights. The chapter illustrates using: the acquisition doctrines for capturing chattels; the tort doctrine regulating disputes in which one appropriator interferes with another’s attempts to capture chattels; and the accession-related fixture and ratione soli rules, both of which take chattels out of the coverage of capture doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: agency, appropriation, consequentialism, control, Enlightenment, free, Haslem v. Lockwood, Immanuel Kant, industrious, John, labor, natural law, ownership, presentation, private, proprietor, prosperity, publick good, rational, Second Treatise of Government, social, subsistence, suum, trespass

JEL Classification: D23, H82, K11, N33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 24, 2012 ; Last revised: May 15, 2013

Suggested Citation

Claeys, Eric R., Productive Use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory (January 8, 2013). Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, eds. James E. Penner & Henry E. Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming); George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066166

Contact Information

Eric R. Claeys (Contact Author)
George Mason University ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Room 420
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
(703) 993-8247 (Phone)
(703) 993-8202 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 416
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 170,775
Footnotes:  108

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds