|
||||
|
||||
The Case for Original IntentJamal GreeneColumbia University - Law School May 24, 2012 George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-309 Abstract: This essay, written for a symposium celebrating the centennial of Max Farrand's Records of the Federal Convention, seeks to situate the constitutional culture's heavy reliance on the Convention debates within an academic environment that is generally hostile to original intent arguments. The essay argues that intentionalist-friendly sources like the Convention records and The Federalist remain important not because they supply evidence of original meaning but rather because the practice of advancing historical arguments is best understood as a rhetorical exercise that derives persuasive authority from the heroic character of the founding generation. This exercise fits within a long tradition of originalist argument and need not be abandoned in the quest for a more perfect originalism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22 Keywords: originalism, original meaning, original intent, federalist, constitutional convention, ethos Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 25, 2012 ; Last revised: July 24, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.719 seconds