Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066234
 


 



The Case for Original Intent


Jamal Greene


Columbia University - Law School

May 24, 2012

George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming
Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-309

Abstract:     
This essay, written for a symposium celebrating the centennial of Max Farrand's Records of the Federal Convention, seeks to situate the constitutional culture's heavy reliance on the Convention debates within an academic environment that is generally hostile to original intent arguments. The essay argues that intentionalist-friendly sources like the Convention records and The Federalist remain important not because they supply evidence of original meaning but rather because the practice of advancing historical arguments is best understood as a rhetorical exercise that derives persuasive authority from the heroic character of the founding generation. This exercise fits within a long tradition of originalist argument and need not be abandoned in the quest for a more perfect originalism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: originalism, original meaning, original intent, federalist, constitutional convention, ethos

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2012 ; Last revised: July 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Greene, Jamal, The Case for Original Intent (May 24, 2012). George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-309. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066234

Contact Information

Jamal Greene (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 616
Downloads: 121
Download Rank: 135,191

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.437 seconds