Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Economics; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics
London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Programme for the Study of Economic Organisation and Public Policy (EOPP); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Stanford University - Department of Economics
CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8930
When asked to name one proposition in the social sciences that is both true and non-trivial, Paul Samuelson famously replied: `Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage'. Truth, however, in Samuelson's reply refers to the fact that Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage is mathematically correct, not that it is empirically valid. The goal of this paper is to assess the empirical performance of Ricardo's ideas. We use novel agricultural data that describe the productivity in 17 crops of 1.6 million parcels of land in 55 countries around the world. Crucially, this dataset contains information about the productivity of each parcel of land in all crops, not just those that are currently being grown. This direct information about relative productivity differences across economic activities allows us to compute, for the first time, the output predicted by Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage. Despite all of the real-world considerations from which this theory abstracts, we find that Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage has significant explanatory power in the data, at least within the scope of our analysis.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: comparative advantage, Ricardian theory
JEL Classification: F10, F11
Date posted: May 25, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.391 seconds