Introduction - The Human Rights Revolution in Criminal Evidence and Procedure

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: REIMAGINING COMMON LAW PROCEDURAL TRADITIONS, P. Roberts and J. Hunter, eds., Hart Publishing, 2012

24 Pages Posted: 25 May 2012

See all articles by Paul Roberts

Paul Roberts

University of Nottingham; University of New South Wales (UNSW) - UNSW Law & Justice; China University of Political Science and Law

Jill Hunter

University of New South Wales (UNSW)

Date Written: May 25, 2012

Abstract

Criminal procedure in the common law world is being recast in the image of human rights. The cumulative impact of human rights laws, both international and domestic, presages a revolution in common law procedural traditions.

This is the thematic introductory chapter to Roberts and Hunter (eds), Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Common Law Procedureal Traditions (Hart Publishing, 2012). The edited collection comprises 16 new essays exploring various aspects of the ‘human rights revolution’ in criminal evidence and procedure in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Singapore, Scotland, South Africa and the USA. The contributors provide expert evaluations of their own domestic law and practice with frequent reference to comparative experiences in other jurisdictions. Some essays focus on specific topics, such as evidence obtained by torture, the presumption of innocence, hearsay, the privilege against self-incrimination, and ‘rape shield’ laws. Others seek to draw more general lessons about the context of law reform, the epistemic demands of the right to a fair trial, the domestic impact of supra-national legal standards (especially the ECHR), and the scope for re-imagining common law procedures through the medium of human rights.

This prefatory essay summarises the main themes and topics developed in each subsequent chapter, and indicates their relationship to the project's overarching concept of 'human rights revolution' and its methodological foundations in 'common law comparativism.'

Keywords: criminal evidence and procedure, human rights revolution, common law comparativism

Suggested Citation

Roberts, Paul and Hunter, Jill, Introduction - The Human Rights Revolution in Criminal Evidence and Procedure (May 25, 2012). CRIMINAL EVIDENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: REIMAGINING COMMON LAW PROCEDURAL TRADITIONS, P. Roberts and J. Hunter, eds., Hart Publishing, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2066771

Paul Roberts (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham ( email )

School of Law
Nottingham, NG7 2RD
United Kingdom

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - UNSW Law & Justice ( email )

Kensington, New South Wales 2052
Australia

China University of Political Science and Law ( email )

25 Xitucheng Rd
Haidian District
Beijing
China

Jill Hunter

University of New South Wales (UNSW) ( email )

Kensington
High St
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
395
Abstract Views
1,771
Rank
137,068
PlumX Metrics