Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066871
 


 



The Individual Mandate and Tax Incentives


Erik M. Jensen


Case Western Reserve University School of Law

May 25, 2012

135 Tax Notes 879 (2012)
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-18

Abstract:     
This article responds to an argument, made by economist Martin Sullivan, that, if the Supreme Court strikes down the individual mandate in the Obamacare legislation, all sorts of tax incentives — which, he argues, are economically equivalent to the mandate — would suddenly be at risk constitutionally. The article argues that (1) mandates and incentives are not necessarily legally equivalent; (2) more generally, economic equivalence does not mean legal equivalence; and (3) as has always been the case, the constitutional merits of tax incentives should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: individual mandate, economic equivalence, tax incentives

JEL Classification: K34

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 26, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Jensen, Erik M., The Individual Mandate and Tax Incentives (May 25, 2012). 135 Tax Notes 879 (2012); Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066871 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2066871

Contact Information

Erik M. Jensen (Contact Author)
Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )
11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States
216-368-3613 (Phone)
216-368-2086 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 353
Downloads: 59
Download Rank: 213,924

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds