|
||||
|
||||
Why Do People Pay for Useless Advice? Implications of Gambler's and Hot-Hand Fallacies in False-Expert SettingNattavudh PowdthaveeUniversity of Warwick Yohanes E. RiyantoNanyang Technological University (NTU) - Division of Economics IZA Discussion Paper No. 6557 Abstract: We investigated experimentally whether people can be induced to believe in a non-existent expert, and subsequently pay for what can only be described as transparently useless advice about future chance events. Consistent with the theoretical predictions made by Rabin (2002) and Rabin and Vayanos (2010), we show empirically that the answer is yes and that the size of the error made systematically by people is large.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 Keywords: gambler's fallacy, hot-hand, random streak, expertise, information JEL Classification: C91, D03 working papers seriesDate posted: May 26, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.422 seconds