|
||||
|
||||
Experimental Evidence of Tax Salience and the Labor-Leisure Decision: Anchoring, Tax Aversion, or Complexity?Andrew T. HayashiNew York University (NYU) - Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy Brent K. NakamuraUniversity of California, Berkeley David GamageUniversity of California, Berkeley - Boalt Hall School of Law May 25, 2012 Public Finance Review, Vol. 41, pp. 203, 2013 UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2067157 NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-14 Abstract: Recent research in marketing and public economics suggests that consumers underestimate the effects of taxes and surcharges on total purchase prices when taxes and surcharges are made less salient. The leading explanation is that consumers anchor on base prices and underadjust for surcharges. We perform experiments that: extend the tax salience and price partitioning literatures to the labor supply context; test the anchoring hypothesis by examining the effects of positive and negative wage surcharges on willingness to work; and test whether responses to price partitioning result from imperfect calculation of all-inclusive prices or from deeper preferences. We reject the anchoring hypothesis and find that subjects are less willing to work both when their wages are partitioned with positive and with negative surcharge components. We also find evidence that partitioned pricing effects result from cognitive limitations and possibly from responses to complexity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37 Keywords: experiment, framing, partitioned pricing, labor supply, taxation, tax salience JEL Classification: C91, D03, H20, J22 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 28, 2012 ; Last revised: February 25, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.969 seconds