Legitimacy at Full Strength: Restructuring the National Hockey League’s Supplementary Discipline Process
Colin R. Bruckel
May 29, 2012
The National Hockey League’s on-ice commissioner discipline system (also referred to as supplementary discipline), its process for levying fines and suspensions for on-ice conduct, has recently come under fire for perceived inequities in the manner in which it has been administered over the 2010-11 and 2011-12 seasons. Although hopes were high for improvement at the start of the 2011-12 season, criticism of NHL suspensions has never been more fervent. Now that the NHL has no collective bargaining agreement in place, supplementary discipline has never been riper for reform. This article identifies six components of the NHL’s on-ice commissioner discipline system: identity of decisionmaker, procedure, due process, the use of precedent, the factors involved, and salary forfeiture, and makes specific recommendations based on the goals of adjudicatory systems.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 59
Keywords: NHL, hockey, National Hockey League, sports, NBA, NFL, MLB
Date posted: May 29, 2012 ; Last revised: December 18, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds