Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2070625
 
 

Footnotes (8)



 


 



Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision in Department of Health & Human Services v. State of Florida


Abigail R. Moncrieff


Boston University - School of Law

Kevin Outterson


Boston University School of Law

Kyle Thomson


Office of Chief Counsel, Food and Drug Administration

David Arnold


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Julia Grace Mirabella


Boston University School of Law

Wang Hao


affiliation not provided to SSRN

May 22, 2012

Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-26
Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-26

Abstract:     
One purpose of the individual mandate is to eliminate the market for self-insured healthcare transactions. It is well-established in this Court’s precedent that the elimination of an interstate commercial market is a constitutionally legitimate end for Congress to pursue under the Commerce Clause. Under the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress may use any reasonably adapted means to accomplish constitutionally legitimate ends. The individual mandate is not only reasonably adapted but is quite elegant as a means of eliminating the market for self-insured healthcare transactions. The provision effectively encourages individuals to shift from the inefficient market for self-insured care to its more efficient substitute market for fully-insured care.

The question presented is whether the minimum coverage provision is a valid exercise of Congress’s powers under Article I of the Constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: Article I, individual mandate, Necessary and Proper Clause, Commerce Clause

JEL Classification: K32, K39

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 1, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Moncrieff, Abigail R. and Outterson, Kevin and Thomson, Kyle and Arnold, David and Mirabella, Julia Grace and Hao, Wang, Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision in Department of Health & Human Services v. State of Florida (May 22, 2012). Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-26; Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2070625 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2070625

Contact Information

Abigail R. Moncrieff (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
#1170D
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-2212 (Phone)
Kevin Outterson
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Kyle Thomson
Office of Chief Counsel, Food and Drug Administration ( email )
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857-0001
United States
David Arnold
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Julia Grace Mirabella
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Wang Hao
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 308
Downloads: 20
Footnotes:  8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds