Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2071478
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



What Dilemma? Moral Evaluation Shapes Factual Belief


Brittany Liu


University of California, Irvine

Peter H. Ditto


University of California, Irvine

May 18, 2012


Abstract:     
Moral dilemmas — like the “trolley problem” or real world examples like capital punishment — result from a conflict between consequentialist and deontological intuitions (i.e., whether ends justify means). We contend that people often resolve such moral conflict by aligning factual beliefs about consequences of acts with evaluations of the act’s inherent morality (i.e., morality independent of its consequences). In both artificial (Study 1) and real world (Study 2) dilemmas, the more an act was deemed inherently immoral, the more it was seen as unlikely to produce beneficial consequences and likely to involve harmful costs. Coherence between moral evaluations and factual beliefs increased with greater moral conviction, self-proclaimed topical knowledge, and political conservatism (Study 2). Reading essays about the inherent morality or immorality of capital punishment (Study 3) changed beliefs about its costs and benefits, even though no information about consequences was supplied. Implications for moral reasoning and political conflict are discussed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: morality, cost-benefit analysis, motivated reasoning

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 1, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Liu, Brittany and Ditto, Peter H., What Dilemma? Moral Evaluation Shapes Factual Belief (May 18, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2071478 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2071478

Contact Information

Brittany Liu (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine ( email )
4201 Social & Behavioral Sciences Gateway
Psychology & Social Behavior Dept
Irvine, CA 62697-7085
United States
Peter H. Ditto
University of California, Irvine ( email )
Campus Drive
Irvine, CA 62697-3125
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,388
Downloads: 283
Download Rank: 61,126
Citations:  1
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds