Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2074734
 


 



Keeping Up with the Joneses: The End of Police-Centric Justifications for the Third-Party Doctrine


Blake Ellis Reid


University of Colorado Law School

June 3, 2012


Abstract:     
I write this essay to make a very narrow point: Justice Sotomayor’s and Justice Alito’s concurring opinions in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Jones seem to suggest that there are at least five votes on the Court for the proposition that the third-party doctrine of the Fourth Amendment cannot be justified by initial or primary reference to the needs of the police. The concurring opinions in Jones suggest that the initial inquiry in any Fourth Amendment search case, particularly those involving a third party, must instead address the objective privacy interests of society’s innocent citizens.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, privacy

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 4, 2012 ; Last revised: August 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Reid, Blake Ellis, Keeping Up with the Joneses: The End of Police-Centric Justifications for the Third-Party Doctrine (June 3, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2074734 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2074734

Contact Information

Blake Ellis Reid (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Law School ( email )
401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
303.492.0548 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 284
Downloads: 42

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds