Corrective Justice for Civil Recourse Theorists
University of Michigan Law School
Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2011
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 275
According to the dominant view, corrective requires that we reverse wrongful transactions, so that a victim is made whole, or put in the position she would have been in absent wrongdoing. In this paper, I argue that this can’t be the fundamental demand of corrective justice, as much of the time we aren’t in a position to do it, or anything like it. Instead, I argue that we should understand corrective justice on a model of “getting even” rather than “making whole.” Along the way, I explore the continuity between remedial practices in tort law and revenge as a response to wrongdoing. Finally, I contend that the civil recourse view of tort law is not an alternative to a corrective justice theory of the institution; it is a corrective justice theory, and a better one than the more familiar sort.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: Corrective Justice, Tort, Aristotle, John Goldberg, Ben Zipursky, Civil Recourse, Ernest Weinrib, John Gardner, Remedies, Getting Even, Revenge, Make Whole, DamagesAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 4, 2012 ; Last revised: July 18, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.484 seconds