Abstract

 
 

References (52)



 


 



Does Modeling Jumps Help? A Comparison of Realized Volatility Models for Risk Prediction


Yin Liao


Australian National University (ANU); Financial Research Network (FIRN)

June 1, 2012

Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis Working Paper No. 26/2012

Abstract:     
Recent literature has focuses on realized volatility models to predict financial risk. This paper studies the benefit of explicitly modeling jumps in this class of models for value at risk (VaR) prediction. Several popular realized volatility models are compared in terms of their VaR forecasting performances through a Monte Carlo study and an analysis based on empirical data of eight Chinese stocks. The results suggest that careful modeling of jumps in realized volatility models can largely improve VaR prediction, especially for emerging markets where jumps play a stronger role than those in developed markets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: value at risk (VaR), realized volatility, jumps

JEL Classification: C13, C32, C52, C53, G17

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 5, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Liao, Yin, Does Modeling Jumps Help? A Comparison of Realized Volatility Models for Risk Prediction (June 1, 2012). Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis Working Paper No. 26/2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2077214 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2077214

Contact Information

Yin Liao (Contact Author)
Australian National University (ANU) ( email )
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601
Australia
Financial Research Network (FIRN)
C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
Queensland
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.firn.org.au

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 593
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 183,805
References:  52

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.438 seconds