Ashworth on Principles

Julian Roberts and Lucia Zedner (eds), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012)

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 28/2012

26 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2012

See all articles by John Gardner

John Gardner

University of Oxford (deceased)

Date Written: June 11, 2012

Abstract

Andrew Ashworth's vast body of work on criminal law and criminal justice is pervaded by appeals to 'principle'. What do these appeals amount to? In this essay I trawl Ashworth's writings for clues, and come up with the proposals that principles are (a) more general than other reasons for action; (b) more powerful than other reasons for action; (c) non-instrumental reasons for action; and (d) categorical reasons for action. I assess these proposals and see whether any of them, individually or in combination, could give principles the role in his thinking about law and life that Ashworth wants and needs them to have. I offer a somewhat sceptical answer to that question.

Keywords: Andrew Ashworth, law, principle, rule, policy, general, instrumental, categorical

Suggested Citation

Gardner, John, Ashworth on Principles (June 11, 2012). Julian Roberts and Lucia Zedner (eds), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 28/2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2081860

John Gardner (Contact Author)

University of Oxford (deceased)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
299
Abstract Views
1,828
Rank
187,021
PlumX Metrics