Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2082521
 
 

Footnotes (71)



 


 



Decision Theory and the Case for a Disclosure-Based Insider Trading Regime


Thomas A. Lambert


University of Missouri - School of Law

June 12, 2012

University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-18

Abstract:     
Stock trading on the basis of material, nonpublic information (insider trading) is a “mixed bag” in that it can create both social harms and social benefits. Attempts to regulate such mixed bag business practices may err in two directions: They may wrongly permit or encourage socially undesirable instances of the practice at issue, or they may wrongly condemn or deter socially desirable instances. In either case, social welfare suffers (i.e., “error costs” result). Attempts to avoid error in one direction or another by heightening the liability inquiry will tend to increase the administrative costs (“decision costs”) of the regulatory regime. Decision theory therefore calls for regulating mixed bag practices under a regime that “minimizes the sum of error and decision costs.”

Adjudged under the decision-theoretic criterion, the current regime for regulating insider trading in the United States fails; it is difficult to administer, and it deters many instances of socially desirable informed trading. The approach apparently favored by the enforcement agencies fares even worse. The laissez-faire, “contractarian” approach favored by many law and economics scholars would represent an improvement over both the legal status quo and the approach favored by the enforcement agencies, but that approach, too, may be suboptimal.

This paper advocates an optional, disclosure-based regulatory regime. Under the regime, authorized informed trading would be permitted as long as the trader first disclosed to a centralized, searchable database her insider status, the fact that she was trading on the basis of material, nonpublic in-formation, and the nature of her trade. Such an approach would (1) enhance the market efficiency benefits of insider trading by facilitating “trade decoding,” while (2) reducing potential costs stemming from deliberate mismanagement, disclosure delays, and infringement of informational property rights. By “accentuating the positive” and “eliminating the negative” consequences of informed trading, the proposed approach would perform better than the legal status quo and the leading proposed regulatory alternatives at minimizing the sum of error and decision costs resulting from insider trading restrictions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: insider trading, decision theory, decision-theoretic, social harms, social benefits, laissez-faire, contractarian

JEL Classification: K20, K22

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 12, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Lambert, Thomas A., Decision Theory and the Case for a Disclosure-Based Insider Trading Regime (June 12, 2012). University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2082521 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2082521

Contact Information

Thomas Andrew Lambert (Contact Author)
University of Missouri - School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,019
Downloads: 130
Download Rank: 134,020
Footnotes:  71

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds