|
||||
|
||||
Confounded FactorsJoseph GerakosUniversity of Chicago - Booth School of Business Juhani T. LinnainmaaUniversity of Chicago - Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) March 27, 2013 Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 12-18 Fama-Miller Working Paper Abstract: Book-to-market (BE/ME) ratios explain variation in expected returns because they correlate with recent changes in the market value of equity. Although the remaining variation in BE/ME ratios captures comovement among stocks, it does not predict returns. Therefore, the HML factor is a sum of two parts: one with a positive price of risk ("priced part") and the other with a zero price of risk ("unpriced part"). The unpriced part confounds the HML factor and distorts inferences. First, portfolio managers can exploit the unpriced part--a portfolio long the priced and short the unpriced part has an annual three-factor model alpha of 7.6%. Second, the three-factor model subsumes the earnings-to-price and cashflow-to-price anomalies only because these anomalies covary with the HML's unpriced part. Third, the unpriced part leads to downwardly biased estimates of money managers' skill. The problem of confounded factors applies to all empirical risk factors.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44 working papers seriesDate posted: June 13, 2012 ; Last revised: March 28, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.610 seconds