Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2083245
 


 



Investment Recommendations and the Essence of Duty


Onnig H. Dombalagian


Tulane Law School

2011

American University Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 5, 2011
Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 12-5

Abstract:     
I recommend that federal bank, commodity, and securities regulators jointly modify the manner in which financial intermediaries market investment transactions in order to provide investors with quantitative information that facilitates comparison across products and understanding of risk. On its face, the Dodd-Frank Act does little to address the balkanization of business conduct standards but continues Congress’s policy of classifying the obligations of financial services providers by regulatory category (e.g., “securities,” “derivatives,” “banking,” “consumer finance”). To the extent that opponents of harmonization dwell on the talismanic significance of words such as “fiduciary,” “suitability,” and “duty of care,” I propose a safe harbor that distills the essence of a fiduciary’s obligations to permit consistent application across all financial services products.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 5, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dombalagian, Onnig H., Investment Recommendations and the Essence of Duty (2011). American University Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 5, 2011; Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 12-5. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2083245

Contact Information

Onnig Hatchig Dombalagian (Contact Author)
Tulane Law School ( email )
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 415
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 214,977

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds