Mapping the World: Facts and Meaning In Adjudication and Mediation
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Maine Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2011, pp. 61-87
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-04
This Article explores what is and what is not in adjudication and mediation, thus illuminating the profound differences between these two processes. The Article does this work in four parts. First, it offers an analysis of cognitive mapmaking and its inevitability in constructing meaning. It then explores how adjudication defines meaning in a particular way. This Article then conducts a comparable analysis of mediation. Finally, it focuses on the bridging function attorneys play between the worlds of mediation and adjudication.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: maps, communication, adjudication, dispute resolution, simplification, facts, rules of evidence, mediation, exclusion, legal representation, lawyers, attorneys
JEL Classification: K19, K39, K49, L84working papers series
Date posted: June 14, 2012 ; Last revised: February 26, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.407 seconds