|
||||
|
||||
Are Banks and Microfinance Institutions Natural Partners in Financial Inclusion?Ignacio MasIndependent Akhand J. Tiwariaffiliation not provided to SSRN Alphina Josaffiliation not provided to SSRN Denny Georgeaffiliation not provided to SSRN Krishna Uma Mahesh Thackeraffiliation not provided to SSRN Nitin Gargaffiliation not provided to SSRN Raunak Kapooraffiliation not provided to SSRN Shivshankar V.affiliation not provided to SSRN Swati Mehtaaffiliation not provided to SSRN Vartika Shuklaaffiliation not provided to SSRN May 14, 2012 MicroSave Focus Note, Forthcoming Abstract: In India, the business case of the BC model is yet unclear. The main limiting factor is very low customer activity rates. Low usage is compounded by the prevalence of unduly low pricing models on the basic savings proposition, which is based on a perception that customers have low willingness to pay for savings services. These two factors are of course linked: usage and willingness to pay are both a function of the strength of the value proposition that customers perceive. Ventures that have incorporated a remittance service have found both higher usage and the ability to charge higher transaction prices. However, the limited geographic coverage of these services limits the value of the remittance service. Where the value proposition is based on remittances, scale and network effects are all-important.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19 Keywords: business correspondents, agent banking, microfinance, access to finance, financial inclusion working papers seriesDate posted: June 15, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds