Abstract

 


 



Procedure, Politics, Prediction, and Professors: A Response to Professors Burbank and Purcell


Stephen Subrin


Northeastern University - School of Law

June 2008

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 156, No. 6, pp. 2151-2160, June 2008
Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper

Abstract:     
In this article I comment on four themes in the work of Stephen Burbank and Edward Purcell, two of the leading scholars of American civil procedure and procedural reform: (1) the relationship of substantive and procedural law; (2) the place of politics in procedural reform; (3) the difficulty of reliably predicting consequences of procedural reform; and (4) challenges that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) and similar reforms present for law professors, both in their roles as researchers and writers, and as teachers of would-be lawyers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 16, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Subrin, Stephen, Procedure, Politics, Prediction, and Professors: A Response to Professors Burbank and Purcell (June 2008). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 156, No. 6, pp. 2151-2160, June 2008; Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2084727

Contact Information

Stephen Subrin (Contact Author)
Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )
400 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 55
Downloads: 5

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.922 seconds