|
||||
|
||||
Procedure, Politics, Prediction, and Professors: A Response to Professors Burbank and PurcellStephen SubrinNortheastern University - School of Law June 2008 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 156, No. 6, pp. 2151-2160, June 2008 Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper Abstract: In this article I comment on four themes in the work of Stephen Burbank and Edward Purcell, two of the leading scholars of American civil procedure and procedural reform: (1) the relationship of substantive and procedural law; (2) the place of politics in procedural reform; (3) the difficulty of reliably predicting consequences of procedural reform; and (4) challenges that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) and similar reforms present for law professors, both in their roles as researchers and writers, and as teachers of would-be lawyers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: June 16, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.922 seconds