Abstract

 


 



Re Wand B; Re W (Care Plan) and Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W (Minors) (Care Order: Adequacy of Care Plan) - A Note on the Judgment from the Perspective of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950


Nuala Mole


AIRE Centre

2002

Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 447-460, 2002

Abstract:     
The House of Lords held that the Children Act 1989 did not permit a court making a care order to oversee the manner in which it was implemented and this was not incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. Key ECHR issues including the positive obligations of the state, the meaning of 'determination' and the execution of judgments were not considered.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: child law, family law, Children Act 1989, Human Rights Act 1998, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, care order

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: June 15, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Mole, Nuala , Re Wand B; Re W (Care Plan) and Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W (Minors) (Care Order: Adequacy of Care Plan) - A Note on the Judgment from the Perspective of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (2002). Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 447-460, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2084842

Contact Information

Nuala Mole (Contact Author)
AIRE Centre
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 179
Downloads: 0

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds