Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (105)



 


 



Stranded in the Technological Dark Ages: Implications of the Full Federal Court’s Decision in NRL v. Optus


Rebecca Giblin


Monash University - Faculty of Law

June 18, 2012

(2012) 35 European Intellectual Property Review 632-641

Abstract:     
Australia’s Full Federal Court recently overturned the findings of the trial judge in the Optus v NRL television time-shifting case. Finding that the time-shifting provider (and not just the user) “makes” the relevant recording, the decision effectively renders remote television time-shifting services unlawful in Australia. This paper argues that it also has significant ramifications for more traditional time-shifting technologies, and, if not overturned, might decimate the value of the nascent Australian time-shifting right and strand consumers in a technological dark age.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: time shifting, time-shifting, time shift, time-shift, timeshift, timeshifting, betamax, sony, cartoon network, optus, telstra, copyright, infringement, internet streaming rights

JEL Classification: O34

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 18, 2012 ; Last revised: May 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Giblin, Rebecca, Stranded in the Technological Dark Ages: Implications of the Full Federal Court’s Decision in NRL v. Optus (June 18, 2012). (2012) 35 European Intellectual Property Review 632-641. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2086396

Contact Information

Rebecca Giblin (Contact Author)
Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,409
Downloads: 191
Download Rank: 79,074
Footnotes:  105
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds