The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes
James E. Bessen
Boston University - School of Law; Research on Innovation
Michael J. Meurer
Boston University - School of Law
June 28, 2012
99 Cornell L. Rev. 387 (2014)
Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-34
In the past, “non-practicing entities” (NPEs), popularly known as “patent trolls,” have helped small inventors profit from their inventions. Is this true today or, given the unprecedented levels of NPE litigation, do NPEs reduce innovation incentives? Using a survey of defendants and a database of litigation, this paper estimates the direct costs to defendants arising from NPE patent assertions. We estimate that firms accrued $29 billion of direct costs in 2011. Although large firms accrued over half of direct costs, most of the defendants were small or medium-sized firms. Moreover, an examination of publicly listed NPEs indicates that little of the direct costs represents a transfer to small inventors. This updated version of the paper includes a reply to critics.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: patent, litigation, litigation cost, non-practicing entities, software patents
JEL Classification: O31, O34, K41
Date posted: June 25, 2012 ; Last revised: March 27, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.203 seconds