The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes
James E. Bessen
Boston University - School of Law; Research on Innovation
Michael J. Meurer
Boston University - School of Law
June 28, 2012
Cornell Law Review, Vol. 99, 2014, Forthcoming
Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-34
In the past, “non-practicing entities” (NPEs), popularly known as “patent trolls,” have helped small inventors profit from their inventions. Is this true today or, given the unprecedented levels of NPE litigation, do NPEs reduce innovation incentives? Using a survey of defendants and a database of litigation, this paper estimates the direct costs to defendants arising from NPE patent assertions. We estimate that firms accrued $29 billion of direct costs in 2011. Moreover, although large firms accrued over half of direct costs, most of the defendants were small or medium-sized firms, indicating that NPEs are not just a problem for large firms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: patent, litigation, litigation cost, non-practicing entities, software patents
JEL Classification: O31, O34, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 25, 2012 ; Last revised: January 7, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.266 seconds