Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2091874
 
 

Footnotes (75)



 


 



Patching a Hole in the JOBS Act: How and Why to Rewrite the Rules that Require Firms to Make Periodic Disclosures


Michael D. Guttentag


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

July 23, 2012

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2013
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-19
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 12-12

Abstract:     
This Article considers if or when firms in the United States should be required to comply with federal periodic disclosure requirements. Such a consideration is timely. Provisions in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 have made it much easier for firms to avoid federal periodic disclosure obligations, but these provisions were enacted based upon a virtually non-existent legislative record and upended rules established only after careful consideration almost fifty years earlier.

Determining which firms should be required to comply with federal periodic disclosure requirements is best done in the context of a broader understanding of the history and economics of periodic disclosure regulation. This Article provides such an understanding. The history of periodic disclosure regulation in the United States is traced back to its origins in the eighteenth century, and the economic analysis of periodic disclosure regulation is updated and refined to incorporate recent findings.

Building on this historical and economic understanding of periodic disclosure regulation, I identify a flaw in the underlying structure of the rules currently used to determine which firms must make periodic disclosures. To rectify this structural problem, I suggest that firms with a market capitalization of less than $35 million or fewer than 100 beneficial shareholders be granted an automatic exemption from periodic disclosure requirements. All other firms should be provided a choice between: 1) complying with federal periodic disclosure obligations, or 2) implementing measures that would mitigate the need for periodic disclosure regulation, such as restricting share tradability or committing to an acceptable alternative disclosure regime.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2012 ; Last revised: July 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Guttentag, Michael D., Patching a Hole in the JOBS Act: How and Why to Rewrite the Rules that Require Firms to Make Periodic Disclosures (July 23, 2012). Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2013; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-19; UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 12-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2091874

Contact Information

Michael D. Guttentag (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,777
Downloads: 202
Download Rank: 86,768
Footnotes:  75
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds