Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2093361
 
 

Footnotes (301)



 


 



Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults


Sergio J. Campos


University of Miami - School of Law

June 26, 2012

Florida Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 6, 2012
University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-17

Abstract:     
The Erie doctrine governs, among other things, when a federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction may use a federal procedure that differs from the procedure that would be used in state court. Displacing the state procedure with the federal procedure (or not) may impact the substantive objectives of either state or federal law, but the current Erie doctrine provides little guidance. This article argues that the Erie doctrine is best understood as governing a choice of enforcement defaults. As argued below, the primary function of civil liability is to protect a substantive entitlement to avoid the legal violation, either directly through specific performance remedies or through deterrence. Accordingly, procedures in federal and state court can be understood as default procedures to enforce this substantive entitlement, and these defaults are often abrogated by contract or through legislation. Understood in this way, the Erie doctrine governs when a federal court may abrogate a state enforcement default with a federal one. This article then uses the existing literature on default rules to argue that the Erie doctrine should itself use default rules to force information from both state and federal governments about the relationship of default procedures to substantive policies. In this way federal courts can make better choices between enforcement defaults.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: erie, rules enabling act, default rules, substance, procedure

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 26, 2012 ; Last revised: April 11, 2013

Suggested Citation

Campos, Sergio J., Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults (June 26, 2012). Florida Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 6, 2012; University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2093361

Contact Information

Sergio J. Campos (Contact Author)
University of Miami - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 358
Downloads: 45
Footnotes:  301

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.343 seconds