Preventive Detention in Europe, the United States and Australia
Vanderbilt University - Law School
June 27, 2012
Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper Working Paper No. 12-27
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-20
Preventive detention, both within the criminal justice system and outside it (e.g. commitment, quarantine and wartime confinement), is under-theorized. The European Court of Human Rights has recently issued a spate of opinions that begin to deal seriously with the issue, in a more sophisticated manner than American courts have. This paper describes the European decisions, especially the European Court's decision in M. v. Germany, compares those decisions to American and Australian law on preventive detention, and discusses how principles I have developed in other work can further the analysis.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: preventive detention, Kansas v. Hendricks, M. v. Germany, sentencing, sex offenders
Date posted: June 28, 2012 ; Last revised: October 26, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds