The Guardians of Knowledge in the Modern State: Post’s Republic and the First Amendment
Seattle University School of Law
Ronald K. L. Collins
University of Washington - School of Law
July 1, 2012
Washington Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 369, 2012
Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 12-30
University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-15
Ronald Collins & David Skover’s piece, The Guardians of Knowledge in the Modern State: Post’s Republic and the First Amendment, is the introductory essay to a symposium volume, published by the University of Washington Law Review, examining Yale Law School Dean Robert Post’s recent book, Democracy, Expertise, and Academic Freedom: A First Amendment Jurisprudence for the Modern State (Yale, 2012). Post’s book posits a way to navigate the First Amendment’s value of safeguarding public opinion from governmental censorship while at the same time preserving a safe haven for expert knowledge within the academy. Collins and Skover describe and examine Dean Post’s dichotomy between the realm of “democratic legitimation,” where the First Amendment should offer its strongest protections, and the realm of “democratic competence,” where the First Amendment should yield to the findings of knowledgeable experts. Questioning the theoretical premises of Dean Post’s book, they argue that a “harm principle” may better explain much of the First Amendment doctrine that Post attempts to reconcile with his dichotomy. Moreover, they challenge Post’s thesis at a more operational level: if his theory is to have any meaningful staying power, it cannot be oblivious to the obvious – that the academic centers of knowledge are increasingly commercialized. Colleges and universities, once seen as bastions of learning serving the common good, have increasingly transformed into citadels of industry serving the cause of private profit. In this commercialized environment, medical schools produce bio-medical studies unduly influenced by industry; brilliant researchers earn lucrative consulting fees; and distinguished professors take title to industry-endowed chairs. In the face of this, ironically Robert Post’s First Amendment theory may unwittingly protect the research produced by for-profit experts, even though pecuniary influences corrupt the integrity of the centers of knowledge.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: Robert Post, First Amendment, censorship, democratic opinion, expert knowledge, academic freedom, harm principle, education, commercialization of educationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 29, 2012 ; Last revised: October 6, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.625 seconds