How Not to Criminalize Cyberbullying
Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
University of Florida - Levin College of Law
Andrea Pinzon Garcia
University of Florida
July 2, 2012
Missouri Law Review, Forthcoming
This essay provides a sustained constitutional critique of the growing body of laws criminalizing cyberbullying. These laws typically proceed by either modernizing existing harassment and stalking laws or crafting new criminal offenses. Both paths are beset with First Amendment perils, which this essay illustrates through 'case studies' of selected legislative efforts. Though sympathetic to the aims of these new laws, this essay contends that reflexive criminalization in response to tragic cyberbullying incidents has led law-makers to conflate cyberbullying as a social problem with cyberbullying as a criminal problem, creating pernicious consequences. The legislative zeal to eradicate cyberbullying potentially produces disproportionate punishment of common childhood wrongdoing. Furthermore, statutes criminalizing cyberbullying are especially prone to overreach in ways that offend the First Amendment, resulting in suppression of constitutionally protected speech, misdirection of prosecutorial resources, misallocation of taxpayer funds to pass and defend such laws, and the blocking of more effective legal reforms. This essay attempts to give legislators the First Amendment guidance they need to distinguish the types of cyberbullying that must be addressed by education, socialization, and stigmatization from those that can be remedied with censorship and criminalization.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: first amendment, cyberbullying, overcriminalization, due process, vagueness, overbreadth, harassment, stalking, freedom of speech, censorship, education, suicide, cyberlaw, social mediaAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 3, 2012 ; Last revised: August 30, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.235 seconds