Clements v. Clements: A Material Contribution to the Jurisprudence - The Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies the Law of Causation
Law Offices of Dr. Emir Crowne
Fleet Street Law; Ryerson University
November 19, 2012
University of Western Ontario Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2012)
The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision Clements v. Clement provides important guidance on the appropriate application of the material contribution test in cases of negligence. This case commentary will provide an overview of the material contribution and “but for” tests of causation, outline the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the decision, and analyze its broader implications. It is suggested that the Court has significantly clarified the law of causation, emphasizing the necessity of utilizing the new “global but for” test, while leaving room for the application of the material contribution test in (as yet to be seen) appropriate circumstances.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: Clements, Supreme Court, causation, material contribution, but for, 2012 SCC 32, Clements v. Clements
Date posted: July 2, 2012 ; Last revised: June 12, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.500 seconds