Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2098005
 


 



Crosses and Culture: State-Sponsored Religious Displays in the U.S. and Europe


Mark L. Movsesian


St. John's University School of Law

June 12, 2012

Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2012
St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2098005

Abstract:     
This article compares the recent jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights on the question of state-sponsored religious displays. Both tribunals insist that states have a duty of religious "neutrality," but each defines that term differently. For the Supreme Court, neutrality means that government may not proselytize, even indirectly, or appear to favor a particular church; neutrality may even mean that government must not endorse religion generally. For the ECtHR, in contrast, neutrality means only that government must avoid active religious indoctrination; the ECtHR allows government to give "preponderant visibility" to the symbols of traditionally dominant churches. The different conceptions of neutrality reflect institutional and cultural realities. Institutionally, the Supreme Court’s status as a constitutional court allows it to adopt a stricter version of neutrality than the ECtHR, which, as a supranational tribunal without formal appellate authority, must accommodate a variety of domestic church-state arrangements. Culturally, the Supreme Court’s conception of neutrality reflects what the recent sociology of religion literature refers to as the American model, which sees churches as voluntary associations that must compete in a free religious market. This model rejects government expressions of support for particular churches as inappropriate market distortions. In contrast, the ECtHR’s thinner conception of neutrality comports with the European model, which accepts culturally dominant, territorial churches as a given.

Keywords: Church and State, Comparative Constitutional Law, European Court of Human Rights, Religious Displays, Religious Neutrality, United States Supreme Court

JEL Classification: K10, K30

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: July 3, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Movsesian, Mark L., Crosses and Culture: State-Sponsored Religious Displays in the U.S. and Europe (June 12, 2012). Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2012; St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2098005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2098005

Contact Information

Mark L. Movsesian (Contact Author)
St. John's University School of Law ( email )
8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States
718-990-5650 (Phone)
718-990-2199 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/graduate/law/faculty/profiles/Movsesian
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 266

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.797 seconds