Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2100618
 


 



Are Readable Judicial Opinions Cited More Often?


Kevin Lee Brady


University of Chicago - Law School

July 4, 2012


Abstract:     
Are judges, lawyers, and law professors more likely to cite readable judicial opinions? To answer this question, I created a dataset of nearly one hundred opinions and analyzed them based on their readability. It turns out readability doesn’t correlate with the number of citations. Instead, variables such as the number of words and the opinion’s subject matter correlate with citations.

To be sure, readability is subjective. But linguists have created objective measures of readability — such as the number of passive sentences in the opinion and the Flesch-Kincaid grade level. I use these measures throughout. Part I provides background information on readability. Part II summarizes the data, and Part III presents the results.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: readability, Flesch-Kincaid, judicial opinions, citations

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 5, 2012 ; Last revised: October 25, 2012

Suggested Citation

Brady, Kevin Lee, Are Readable Judicial Opinions Cited More Often? (July 4, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2100618 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2100618

Contact Information

Kevin Lee Brady (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 491
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 189,246

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds