Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2102134
 


 



Why Patentable Subject Matter Matters for Software


Brian J. Love


Santa Clara University School of Law

July 7, 2012

George Washington Law Review Arguendo, Vol. 81, p. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
Increasingly, courts weary from years of arguing about the scope of patentable subject matter for software patents seem ready to throw in the towel. Rather than continue efforts to craft a test for determining when a software invention graduates from an “abstract idea” or mere algorithm into a patentable invention, several recent Federal Circuit opinions dismissinely reject section 101 challenges as attacks that should have be made instead under sections 102, 103, and 112. This short essay criticizes this recent trend in patentable subject matter jurisprudence. Accused infringers look to section 101 for relief not because doing so is a convenient shortcut around more traditional checks on patentability, but rather precisely because traditional checks on patentability have proven to be woefully ineffective weapons against overbroad software patents.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: patentable subject matter, software patents, Mayo v. Prometheus, Ultramercial v. WildTangent

JEL Classification: O34, K00, L86

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 8, 2012 ; Last revised: September 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Love, Brian J., Why Patentable Subject Matter Matters for Software (July 7, 2012). George Washington Law Review Arguendo, Vol. 81, p. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2102134

Contact Information

Brian J. Love (Contact Author)
Santa Clara University School of Law ( email )
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95053
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,027
Downloads: 184
Download Rank: 91,574

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds