SUNY Buffalo Law School
October 1, 2012
61 Buffalo Law Review 345 (2013)
This article examines the effect of departmentalism on presidential compliance with constitutional law. Most commentators agree that departmentalism weakens the influence of courts in the determination of constitutional meaning and the control of non-judicial actors. The article takes a different view. It defines “moderate departmentalism” as the authority of the President to refuse to adopt a constitutional interpretation announced by the Supreme Court. Drawing on ideas developed in the literature on “new governance” and administrative law, it then argues that moderate departmentalism increases the capacity of the federal courts to control presidential conduct.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 67
Keywords: departmentalism, presidential review, executive review, judicial supremacy, popular constitutionalism, separation of powers, non-enforcement, new governance, collaborative governanceAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 10, 2012 ; Last revised: April 22, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.859 seconds