|
||||
|
||||
Brief of 25 Intellectual Property Law Professors in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, No. 11-697Aaron PerzanowskiCase Western Reserve University - School of Law Jason SchultzUniversity of California, Berkeley - School of Law Daryl JosefferKing & Spalding Paul Alessio MezzinaKing & Spalding July 9, 2012 UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2102831 Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2012-09 Abstract: The first sale doctrine has long provided that legitimate owners of non-infringing copies of copyrighted works may use and sell their copies as they see fit — just as all property owners may generally use and alienate their property. In keeping with that rationale, the doctrine traditionally applied to all works made and sold by the copyright holder or its licensee, regardless of the place of the manufacture or the first sale of a particular copy. The Second Circuit’s contrary holding — that 17 U.S.C. § 109(a) categorically bars application of the first sale doctrine to foreign-made goods — runs contrary to the statutory context in which § 109(a) appears, the common-law backdrop against which Congress legislated, and analogous principles of patent law as well.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40 working papers seriesDate posted: July 10, 2012 ; Last revised: September 10, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds