Towards a Modest Legal Moralism
R. A. Duff
University of Minnesota Law School; University of Stirling - Department of Philosophy
Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 8, 2013
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-28
After distinguishing different types of Legal Moralism (positive/negative; modest/ ambitious) I defend a modest, positive Legal Moralism: we have good reason to criminalize a type of conduct if and only if it constitutes a public wrong. Some of the central elements of the argument will be: the need to begin not (as many Legal Moralists begin) with the entire realm of moral wrongdoing, but with conduct falling within the public realm of civic life; the significance of the various different processes of criminalization (of which legislation is only one); and the need to attend to the relationship between criminal law and other modes of legal regulation. Criminal law focuses on wrongs: it identifies a set of public wrongs, and provides for those accused of committing such wrongs to be called to formal public account.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Legal Moralism, processes of criminalization, public wrongs, the public realmAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 10, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.687 seconds