Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2103710
 


 



The Embedded Epistemologist: Dispatches from the Legal Front


Susan Haack


University of Miami - School of Law; University of Miami - Department of Philosophy

July 11, 2012

Ratio Juris. Vol. 25 No. 2, June 2012
University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper 2012-21

Abstract:     
In ordinary circumstances, we can assess the worth of evidence well enough without benefit of any theory; but when evidence is especially complex, ambiguous, or emotionally disturbing - as it often is in legal context - epistemological theory may be helpful. A legal fact-finder is asked to determine whether the propostion that the defendant is guilty, or is liable, is established to the required degree of proof by the [admissible] evidence presented; i.e, to make an epistemological appraisal. The foundherentist theory developed in Evidence and Inquiry can help us understand what this means; and reveals that degrees of proof cannot be construed as mathematical probabilities: a point illustrated by comparing the advantages of a foundherentist analysis with the disadvantages of probabilistic analyses of the evidence in the Sacco and Vanzetti case (1921), and of the role of the statistical evidence in Collins (1996).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 13, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Haack, Susan, The Embedded Epistemologist: Dispatches from the Legal Front (July 11, 2012). Ratio Juris. Vol. 25 No. 2, June 2012; University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper 2012-21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2103710

Contact Information

Susan Haack (Contact Author)
University of Miami - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States
305-284-3541 (Phone)
305-284-6506 (Fax)
University of Miami - Department of Philosophy ( email )
P.O. Box 248054
Coral Gables, FL 33124-4670
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 298
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 178,357
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds