Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2103808
 
 

Footnotes (75)



 


 



Lawfare and Counterlawfare: The Demonization of the Gitmo Bar and Other Legal Strategies in the War on Terror


David Jason Rankin Frakt


US Air Force JAG Corps Reserve; University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

2010

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, p. 355, 2010

Abstract:     
If “lawfare” is “the wrongful manipulation of the law and legal systems by our enemies to achieve strategic military or political ends” against the United States and other democratic allies, then the United States needs a “counterlawfare” strategy in response. This article proposes and defines the term counterlawfare as “defensive measures to reduce vulnerabilities to the enemy‟s use of lawfare and actions to contain and minimize the effectiveness of lawfare, including, but not limited to: preparing the legal battlespace; denying, disrupting, and degrading the enemy‟s ability to use lawfare; and delegitimizing the enemy‟s lawfare efforts” and uses the concept to analyze the Bush Administration legal strategies in the war on terror. The article analyzes several specific legal actions, including the efforts to discredit and malign attorneys who represented Guantánamo detainees, which attacks have continued to come from defenders of Bush-era policies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: lawfare, counterlawfare, Guantanamo, Gitmo bar

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Frakt, David Jason Rankin, Lawfare and Counterlawfare: The Demonization of the Gitmo Bar and Other Legal Strategies in the War on Terror (2010). Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, p. 355, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2103808

Contact Information

David Jason Rankin Frakt (Contact Author)
US Air Force JAG Corps Reserve ( email )
United States
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 161
Downloads: 29
Footnotes:  75

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.937 seconds