Process Failure and Transparency Reform in Local Redistricting
State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo - Law School
July 11, 2012
SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-004
Redistricting reform during this cycle has pushed for greater transparency in redistricting, more public participation, the removal of redistricting from the hands of legislatures, and the design of more legitimate redistricting institutions and decision procedures. Reform efforts, however, are generally focused on statewide and congressional redistricting. Meanwhile, little, if anything, is being done to reform or study thousands of local redistrictings across the country, which typically take place under the radar. Local redistricting processes, moreover, vary between jurisdictions and levels of government, take place in institutional contexts that differ from statewide redistricting, are subject to different political dynamics, and are more vulnerable to serious process failures than statewide redistricting. This article advances a policy proposal to reform local redistricting that weds aspects from several contemporary governance approaches – including so-called ‘third-generation transparency” methods. The article suggests that sates establish centralized statewide redistricting clearinghouses for local redistricting (RDCs) that would standardize and systematize the disclosure of redistricting data and process information across the whole range of jurisdictions within a state. It sets forth the proposed design of such RDCs in some detail upon a careful dissection of the concrete information requirements of the different governmental and nongovernmental actors at each stage of the redistricting process; and of the institutional and political dynamics of local processes. The proposal envisions adapting new technologies to address process failures, but leaving existing local institutional arrangements in place.
Apart from its specific intervention in the national debate about redistricting reform, this article can also be read as a contribution to the broader literature about new governance approaches, and more specifically, as a case study on how certain mechanisms of “targeted transparency” or “choice architecture” can be applied to regulating the democratic political process.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 51
Keywords: Redistricting, Election Law, Election Administration, GIS Clearinghouses, Transparency, Choice Architectures, New Institutionalism, New Governance, Law and Democracy
JEL Classification: D72, D73, H70, H77working papers series
Date posted: July 11, 2012 ; Last revised: September 16, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.609 seconds