Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2105785
 


 



Policy Preferences and Expertise in Canadian Tax Adjudication


Benjamin Alarie


University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Andrew James Green


University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

October 27, 2014

Canadian Tax Journal/Revue Fiscale Canadienne, Vol. 62, No. 4, 2014, 985-1027

Abstract:     
Taxpayers and governments alike struggle to stay on top of the various complex sources of tax law and to apply them in a myriad of contexts. Given the potential for confusion and disagreement (not to mention the sometimes large financial stakes involved), it is appropriate to have a process for taxpayers to appeal government decisions to an expert body that can provide authoritative, reasoned, and rational solutions to tax disputes. For this reason Canada, like the United States, has a specialized tax court dedicated to hearing appeals from decisions of the tax administration. Yet there is some evidence in both countries that judges in tax cases may be influenced by their own personal policy preferences or other factors extraneous to the “true” legal merits in deciding appeals. This article examines appeals from tax assessments in Canada to understand the relative influence of judicial tax expertise and the policy preferences of judges on decisions at the Tax Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Appeal. The authors first describe the institutions and processes for tax appeals. They then analyze the impact of judicial expertise and policy preferences on outcomes of tax appeals, drawing on approximately 3,400 decisions of the Tax Court of Canada in the period 2000-2006 and including, where applicable, the related appeals to the Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. The authors arrive at and discuss three main results of the study: (1) policy preferences of judges matter, but not that much; (2) resources matter — a lot; and (3) there are dynamics relating to affirmation of appeals by the Federal Court of Appeal that are difficult to explain, although a desire to avoid the apprehension of bias is possible.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: judicial decision-making, administrative law, policy preferences, judicial attributes

JEL Classification: K34, K41, K49


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 15, 2012 ; Last revised: February 24, 2015

Suggested Citation

Alarie, Benjamin and Green, Andrew James, Policy Preferences and Expertise in Canadian Tax Adjudication (October 27, 2014). Canadian Tax Journal/Revue Fiscale Canadienne, Vol. 62, No. 4, 2014, 985-1027. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2105785 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2105785

Contact Information

Benjamin Alarie (Contact Author)
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )
84 Queen's Park Blvd
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
416-946-8205 (Phone)
416-978-7899 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utoronto.ca/faculty/alarie/

Andrew James Green
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )
84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 908
Downloads: 152
Download Rank: 122,918

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds