Assessing the Potential Effects of Citizens United: Evidence from the States
University of Texas at Austin - Red McCombs School of Business
John J. Coleman
University of Wisconsin - Madison
February 21, 2013
APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC was one of its most controversial in decades. Critics of the decision argued it would lead to a flood of corporate and union cash that would warp electoral and policy outcomes. We test for this possibility by exploiting the variation in campaign finance laws at the state level from 1977 through 2006. Through an analysis of three policy outcomes of interest to businesses and unions over three decades — the degree of liberalism among state elected officials; the relative state minimum wage compared to the federal minimum wage; and the degree of pre-transfer income inequality in a state — we find minimal effects for the overall campaign finance regulatory regimes in general and corporate and union independent expenditures specifically on public policy outcomes. These findings suggest that critics’ fears about the possible effects of Citizens United at the national level may be overstated.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: Citizens United, campaign finance, business and politicsworking papers series
Date posted: July 15, 2012 ; Last revised: March 27, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds