Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2109419
 
 

Footnotes (177)



 


 



Settled Versus Right: Constitutional Method and the Path of Precedent


Randy J. Kozel


Notre Dame Law School

July 16, 2012

Texas Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 7, 2013
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-66

Abstract:     
Constitutional precedents give rise to a jurisprudential tug-of-war. On one side is the value of adhering to precedent and allowing the law to remain settled. On the other side is the value of departing from precedent and allowing the law to improve. In this Article, I contend that negotiating the tension depends on bridging the divide between constitutional precedent and interpretive method.

My aim is to analyze the ways in which theories of precedent are, and are not, derivative of overarching methods of constitutional interpretation. I seek to demonstrate that although certain consequences of deviating from precedent can be studied in isolation, the ultimate choice between overruling and retaining a past decision requires the integration of a broader interpretive method. Moreover, because a single interpretive philosophy may be derived from varying normative baselines, constitutional lawyers must press beyond the threshold election of competing methodological schools to engage with the schools’ respective foundations. Whether one’s preferred approach is originalism, living constitutionalism, or otherwise, the importance of implementing a given constitutional rule depends on methodological commitments and the normative premises that inform them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: constitutional law, constitutional theory, constitutional interpretation, federal courts, stare decisis, precedent, legal change

JEL Classification: K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2012 ; Last revised: July 16, 2013

Suggested Citation

Kozel, Randy J., Settled Versus Right: Constitutional Method and the Path of Precedent (July 16, 2012). Texas Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 7, 2013; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-66. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2109419 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2109419

Contact Information

Randy J. Kozel (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,321
Downloads: 272
Download Rank: 63,276
Footnotes:  177

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds