Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2109894
 


 



The Inability of Jurors to Self-Diagnose Bias


Christopher T. Robertson


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics; Harvard University - Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics

David V. Yokum


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law; University of Arizona - College of Science

Matt J. Palmer


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

April 24, 2013

7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12-35

Abstract:     
The Constitution guarantees litigants an 'impartial' jury, one that bases its judgment on the evidence presented in the courtroom, untainted by affiliations with the parties, racial animus, or media coverage that may include inadmissible facts, a one-sided portrayal, and naked opinion. Problems of juror bias arise in almost every trial – state and federal, civil and criminal - and the problem is most severe in the highest profile cases, where the need for accuracy and legitimacy in outcomes is most salient.

The Supreme Court has instructed courts to use a simple method to determine whether jurors are biased: ask them. Studies have shown that the juror’s self-diagnosis is the most important factor for the court’s decision about whether to seat the juror.

To test the reliability of these self-diagnoses, we fielded a randomized controlled experiment, in which we exposed mock jurors to news articles that were either prejudicial to the defendant (in one condition) or irrelevant (in the other condition). We then gave jurors the admonitions and questions endorsed by the Supreme Court for the purpose of identifying biased jurors, prior to all of them watching a 32-minute condensed video of a civil trial, rendering binary judgments, and awarding damages

After we excluded jurors who said that they would be unable to be fair and impartial (or were unsure), the remaining jurors were significantly more likely to rule against the defendant and those that did so also awarded larger damages, than those in the control condition. Thus, juror self-assessments were not related to actual bias.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: jury, bias, publicity, voir dire, jury selection, Skilling v. United States, change of venue, peremptory challenges, challenges for cause

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 16, 2012 ; Last revised: April 27, 2013

Suggested Citation

Robertson, Christopher T. and Yokum, David V. and Palmer, Matt J., The Inability of Jurors to Self-Diagnose Bias (April 24, 2013). 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12-35. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2109894 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2109894

Contact Information

Christopher T. Robertson (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.arizona.edu/faculty/getprofile.cfm?facultyid=714

Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics ( email )
124 Mount Auburn Street
Suite 520N
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Harvard University - Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics ( email )
23 Everett Street
Cambridge, MA 02155
United States
David V. Yokum
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
University of Arizona - College of Science ( email )
1040 E. Fourth Street
Tucson, AZ 85721-0077
United States
Matt J. Palmer
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,030
Downloads: 255
Download Rank: 285,926

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds