Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2110294
 
 

Footnotes (149)



 


 



Can Law and Literature Be Practical? The Crucible and the Federal Rules of Evidence


Martin H. Pritikin


Whittier Law School

July 16, 2012

West Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Counter-intuitively, one of the best ways to learn the practice-oriented topic of evidence may be by studying a work of fiction — specifically, Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, which dramatizes the 17th century Salem witch trials. The play puts the reader in the position of legal advocate, and invites strategic analysis of evidentiary issues. A close analysis of the dialogue presents an opportunity to explore both the doctrinal nuances of and policy considerations underlying the most important topics covered by the Federal Rules of Evidence, including relevance, character evidence and impeachment, opinion testimony, hearsay, and the mode and order of interrogation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Arthur Miller, Crucible, evidence, law and literature

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Pritikin, Martin H., Can Law and Literature Be Practical? The Crucible and the Federal Rules of Evidence (July 16, 2012). West Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2110294

Contact Information

Martin H. Pritikin (Contact Author)
Whittier Law School ( email )
3333 Harbor Blvd.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 473
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 208,228
Footnotes:  149

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds