Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2110376
 


 



Public Intuitions about Fair Child Support Allocations: Converging Evidence for a 'Fair Shares' Rule


Sanford L. Braver


Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

Ira Mark Ellman


Arizona State University College of Law; Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

Robert MacCoun


Stanford Law School

June 23, 2013

7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2110376

Abstract:     
Nearly all American states use one of two systems for setting the amount of child support that noncustodial parents (NCPs) are required to pay to custodial parents (CPs). In previous work we found that lay judgments of the child support amount the law should require differ in meaningful ways from these two systems: Our respondents favor child support amounts that are more responsive to the NCP’s income, and much more responsive to the CP’s income, than set by either system. They also favor dollar amounts that increase more rapidly with NCP income when CP income is lower, producing a characteristic fanning lines pattern when dollar support amounts are charted against NCP income for several different CP incomes. We give the label “Fair Shares” to these two features of our respondents’ child support judgments. We describe 6 new experimental studies that vary the context of these judgments in ways that test whether the “Fair Shares” account is robust. Our studies consistently replicate the fan shaped pattern and shed further light on lay judgments. A revised version of this paper has been acceptred for publication in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2012 ; Last revised: November 22, 2013

Suggested Citation

Braver, Sanford L. and Ellman, Ira Mark and MacCoun, Robert, Public Intuitions about Fair Child Support Allocations: Converging Evidence for a 'Fair Shares' Rule (June 23, 2013). 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2110376. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2110376 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2110376

Contact Information

Sanford L. Braver (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Ira Mark Ellman
Arizona State University College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
480-965-2125 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.asu.edu/HomePages/Ellman/
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Robert MacCoun
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 244
Downloads: 39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.437 seconds